ING vs RY

ING Group, N.V. vs Royal Bank Of Canada — Valuation Comparison 2026

ING

Banks - Diversified
ING Group, N.V.
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$30.84
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

RY

Banks - Diversified
Royal Bank Of Canada
Quality
8.6
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$188.89
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ING Fair ValueING Upside RY Fair ValueRY Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $10.28 -66.7% $105.39 -44.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $12.67 -54.7% $148.91 -21.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ING vs RY — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ING vs RY — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

RY scores higher with a 8.6/10 quality rating vs ING's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing ING Group, N.V. (ING) and Royal Bank Of Canada (RY) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ING currently trades at $30.84 with a QOC of 1.7/10, while RY trades at $188.89 with a QOC of 8.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).