HYFM vs PCAR

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. vs PACCAR Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

HYFM

Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery
Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.
Quality
4.1
out of 10
Value Trap
32
LOW
Price
$0.98
Last close
Models
1/13
Active
VS

PCAR

Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery
PACCAR Inc.
Quality
8.6
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$112.22
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HYFM Fair ValueHYFM Upside PCAR Fair ValuePCAR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $2.27 +88.8% $113.20 +0.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $39.58 -64.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HYFM vs PCAR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HYFM vs PCAR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PCAR scores higher with a 8.6/10 quality rating vs HYFM's 4.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (HYFM) and PACCAR Inc. (PCAR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HYFM currently trades at $0.98 with a QOC of 4.1/10, while PCAR trades at $112.22 with a QOC of 8.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).