HON vs SIF

Honeywell International Inc. vs SIFCO Industries, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

HON

Aircraft Engines & Engine Parts
Honeywell International Inc.
Quality
8.6
out of 10
Value Trap
8
SAFE
Price
$237.86
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

SIF

Aircraft Engines & Engine Parts
SIFCO Industries, Inc.
Quality
7.7
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$20.27
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HON Fair ValueHON Upside SIF Fair ValueSIF Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $61.55 -74.1% $16.87 -16.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $62.59 -73.7% $12.99 -35.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HON vs SIF — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HON vs SIF — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HON scores higher with a 8.6/10 quality rating vs SIF's 7.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Honeywell International Inc. (HON) and SIFCO Industries, Inc. (SIF) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HON currently trades at $237.86 with a QOC of 8.6/10, while SIF trades at $20.27 with a QOC of 7.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).