HMR vs ICON

Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. vs Icon Energy Corp. — Valuation Comparison 2026

HMR

Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight
Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp.
Quality
5.2
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$1.23
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

ICON

Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight
Icon Energy Corp.
Quality
4.2
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$1.40
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HMR Fair ValueHMR Upside ICON Fair ValueICON Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.60 +30.2% $3.07 +171.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.70 -43.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $0.16 -80.3% $0.42 -70.3%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HMR vs ICON — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HMR vs ICON — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HMR scores higher with a 5.2/10 quality rating vs ICON's 4.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. (HMR) and Icon Energy Corp. (ICON) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HMR currently trades at $1.23 with a QOC of 5.2/10, while ICON trades at $1.40 with a QOC of 4.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).