HLX vs NGS

Helix Energy Solutions Group, I vs Natural Gas Services Group, Inc — Valuation Comparison 2026

HLX

Oil & Gas Field Services, NEC
Helix Energy Solutions Group, I
Quality
7.6
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$9.35
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

NGS

Oil & Gas Field Services, NEC
Natural Gas Services Group, Inc
Quality
8.7
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$39.30
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HLX Fair ValueHLX Upside NGS Fair ValueNGS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $5.66 -39.5% $63.25 +60.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $7.97 -14.8% $5.07 -88.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HLX vs NGS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HLX vs NGS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

NGS scores higher with a 8.7/10 quality rating vs HLX's 7.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Helix Energy Solutions Group, I (HLX) and Natural Gas Services Group, Inc (NGS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HLX currently trades at $9.35 with a QOC of 7.6/10, while NGS trades at $39.30 with a QOC of 8.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).