HLT vs IHG

Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. vs Intercontinental Hotels Group — Valuation Comparison 2026

HLT

Hotels & Motels
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
Quality
8.8
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$327.66
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

IHG

Hotels & Motels
Intercontinental Hotels Group
Quality
2.1
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$154.88
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HLT Fair ValueHLT Upside IHG Fair ValueIHG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $25.62 -92.2% $58.41 -62.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $19.96 -93.9% $102.01 -29.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HLT vs IHG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HLT vs IHG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HLT scores higher with a 8.8/10 quality rating vs IHG's 2.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) and Intercontinental Hotels Group (IHG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HLT currently trades at $327.66 with a QOC of 8.8/10, while IHG trades at $154.88 with a QOC of 2.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).