HII vs KITT

Huntington Ingalls Industries, vs Nauticus Robotics, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

HII

Aerospace & Defense
Huntington Ingalls Industries,
Quality
8.2
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$320.90
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

KITT

Aerospace & Defense
Nauticus Robotics, Inc.
Quality
3.3
out of 10
Value Trap
37
LOW
Price
$1.72
Last close
Models
3/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HII Fair ValueHII Upside KITT Fair ValueKITT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $295.93 -7.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $28.61 -91.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $118.98 -62.9% $0.11 -93.6%
PWERM Option-Based $419.76 +30.8% $5.84 +239.7%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HII vs KITT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HII vs KITT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HII scores higher with a 8.2/10 quality rating vs KITT's 3.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Huntington Ingalls Industries, (HII) and Nauticus Robotics, Inc. (KITT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HII currently trades at $320.90 with a QOC of 8.2/10, while KITT trades at $1.72 with a QOC of 3.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).