HGV vs TH

Hilton Grand Vacations Inc. vs Target Hospitality Corp. — Valuation Comparison 2026

HGV

Hotels, Rooming Houses, Camps & Other Lodging Places
Hilton Grand Vacations Inc.
Quality
7.1
out of 10
Value Trap
37
LOW
Price
$52.02
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

TH

Hotels, Rooming Houses, Camps & Other Lodging Places
Target Hospitality Corp.
Quality
5.9
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$17.36
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HGV Fair ValueHGV Upside TH Fair ValueTH Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $19.25 -63.0% $15.74 -9.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.32 -92.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $4.69 -90.3% $1.36 -92.1%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HGV vs TH — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HGV vs TH — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HGV scores higher with a 7.1/10 quality rating vs TH's 5.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Hilton Grand Vacations Inc. (HGV) and Target Hospitality Corp. (TH) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HGV currently trades at $52.02 with a QOC of 7.1/10, while TH trades at $17.36 with a QOC of 5.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).