GTLS vs IMSR

Chart Industries, Inc. vs Terrestrial Energy Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

GTLS

Fabricated Plate Work (Boiler Shops)
Chart Industries, Inc.
Quality
8.6
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$207.82
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

IMSR

Fabricated Plate Work (Boiler Shops)
Terrestrial Energy Inc.
Quality
5.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$9.13
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GTLS Fair ValueGTLS Upside IMSR Fair ValueIMSR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $12.49 -94.0% $2.10 -77.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $666.66 +220.8% $0.29 -96.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GTLS vs IMSR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GTLS vs IMSR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GTLS scores higher with a 8.6/10 quality rating vs IMSR's 5.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS) and Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GTLS currently trades at $207.82 with a QOC of 8.6/10, while IMSR trades at $9.13 with a QOC of 5.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).