GPGI vs HKD

GPGI, Inc. vs AMTD Digital Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

GPGI

Finance Services
GPGI, Inc.
Quality
5.6
out of 10
Value Trap
8
SAFE
Price
$12.16
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

HKD

Finance Services
AMTD Digital Inc.
Quality
7.2
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$1.82
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GPGI Fair ValueGPGI Upside HKD Fair ValueHKD Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.34 -97.2% $0.33 -80.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $2.34 -85.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $0.71 -95.4% $0.49 -71.6%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GPGI vs HKD — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GPGI vs HKD — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HKD scores higher with a 7.2/10 quality rating vs GPGI's 5.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing GPGI, Inc. (GPGI) and AMTD Digital Inc. (HKD) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GPGI currently trades at $12.16 with a QOC of 5.6/10, while HKD trades at $1.82 with a QOC of 7.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).