GIS vs INGR

General Mills, Inc. vs Ingredion Incorporated — Valuation Comparison 2026

GIS

Grain Mill Products
General Mills, Inc.
Quality
7.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$33.81
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

INGR

Grain Mill Products
Ingredion Incorporated
Quality
6.3
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$101.44
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GIS Fair ValueGIS Upside INGR Fair ValueINGR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $44.38 +31.2% $77.18 -23.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $41.89 +23.9% $153.96 +51.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GIS vs INGR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GIS vs INGR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GIS scores higher with a 7.6/10 quality rating vs INGR's 6.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GIS currently trades at $33.81 with a QOC of 7.6/10, while INGR trades at $101.44 with a QOC of 6.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).