GHM vs TWIN

Graham Corporation vs Twin Disc, Incorporated — Valuation Comparison 2026

GHM

General Industrial Machinery & Equipment
Graham Corporation
Quality
9.6
out of 10
Value Trap
21
SAFE
Price
$100.14
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

TWIN

General Industrial Machinery & Equipment
Twin Disc, Incorporated
Quality
7.8
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$16.68
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GHM Fair ValueGHM Upside TWIN Fair ValueTWIN Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $19.63 -80.4% $3.06 -81.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $9.39 -90.6% $2.88 -82.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GHM vs TWIN — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GHM vs TWIN — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GHM scores higher with a 9.6/10 quality rating vs TWIN's 7.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Graham Corporation (GHM) and Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GHM currently trades at $100.14 with a QOC of 9.6/10, while TWIN trades at $16.68 with a QOC of 7.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).