GFR vs HESM

Greenfire Resources Ltd. vs Hess Midstream LP — Valuation Comparison 2026

GFR

Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas
Greenfire Resources Ltd.
Quality
6.6
out of 10
Value Trap
9
SAFE
Price
$5.63
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

HESM

Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas
Hess Midstream LP
Quality
9.5
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$37.50
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GFR Fair ValueGFR Upside HESM Fair ValueHESM Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.12 -80.2% $63.07 +68.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.32 -76.5% $12.95 -65.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GFR vs HESM — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GFR vs HESM — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HESM scores higher with a 9.5/10 quality rating vs GFR's 6.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Greenfire Resources Ltd. (GFR) and Hess Midstream LP (HESM) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GFR currently trades at $5.63 with a QOC of 6.6/10, while HESM trades at $37.50 with a QOC of 9.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).