GE vs OTIS

GE Aerospace vs Otis Worldwide Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

GE

Electronic & Other Electrical Equipment (No Computer Equip)
GE Aerospace
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$323.76
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

OTIS

Electronic & Other Electrical Equipment (No Computer Equip)
Otis Worldwide Corporation
Quality
7.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$70.84
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GE Fair ValueGE Upside OTIS Fair ValueOTIS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $85.30 -73.7% $33.06 -53.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $61.81 -80.9% $18.94 -73.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GE vs OTIS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GE vs OTIS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GE scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs OTIS's 7.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing GE Aerospace (GE) and Otis Worldwide Corporation (OTIS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GE currently trades at $323.76 with a QOC of 10.0/10, while OTIS trades at $70.84 with a QOC of 7.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).