GDS vs GDYN

GDS Holdings Limited vs Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

GDS

Information Technology Services
GDS Holdings Limited
Quality
7.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$35.23
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

GDYN

Information Technology Services
Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc.
Quality
8.2
out of 10
Value Trap
25
LOW
Price
$7.37
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GDS Fair ValueGDS Upside GDYN Fair ValueGDYN Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $25.12 -28.7% $8.40 +13.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $4.64 -37.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $8.27 -81.6%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GDS vs GDYN — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GDS vs GDYN — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GDYN scores higher with a 8.2/10 quality rating vs GDS's 7.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing GDS Holdings Limited (GDS) and Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. (GDYN) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GDS currently trades at $35.23 with a QOC of 7.7/10, while GDYN trades at $7.37 with a QOC of 8.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).