FPI vs FRT

Farmland Partners Inc. vs Federal Realty Investment Trust — Valuation Comparison 2026

FPI

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Farmland Partners Inc.
Quality
8.7
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$10.27
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

FRT

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Federal Realty Investment Trust
Quality
8.1
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$119.63
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FPI Fair ValueFPI Upside FRT Fair ValueFRT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.01 -90.3% $89.90 -24.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.80 -92.6% $49.74 -58.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FPI vs FRT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FPI vs FRT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

FPI scores higher with a 8.7/10 quality rating vs FRT's 8.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FPI currently trades at $10.27 with a QOC of 8.7/10, while FRT trades at $119.63 with a QOC of 8.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).