FOR vs FPH

Forestar Group Inc vs Five Point Holdings, LLC — Valuation Comparison 2026

FOR

Real Estate
Forestar Group Inc
Quality
7.4
out of 10
Value Trap
42
WARN
Price
$27.47
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

FPH

Real Estate
Five Point Holdings, LLC
Quality
8.3
out of 10
Value Trap
31
LOW
Price
$5.03
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FOR Fair ValueFOR Upside FPH Fair ValueFPH Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.32 -95.2% $9.61 +91.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $8.31 -69.8% $12.07 +140.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FOR vs FPH — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FOR vs FPH — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

FPH scores higher with a 8.3/10 quality rating vs FOR's 7.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Forestar Group Inc (FOR) and Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FOR currently trades at $27.47 with a QOC of 7.4/10, while FPH trades at $5.03 with a QOC of 8.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).