FLY vs KTOS

Firefly Aerospace Inc. vs Kratos Defense & Security Solut — Valuation Comparison 2026

FLY

Guided Missiles & Space Vehicles & Parts
Firefly Aerospace Inc.
Quality
6.4
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$46.49
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

KTOS

Guided Missiles & Space Vehicles & Parts
Kratos Defense & Security Solut
Quality
8.0
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$64.13
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FLY Fair ValueFLY Upside KTOS Fair ValueKTOS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $10.93 -76.5% $4.59 -92.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $9.38 -72.3% $6.44 -90.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FLY vs KTOS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FLY vs KTOS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

KTOS scores higher with a 8.0/10 quality rating vs FLY's 6.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Firefly Aerospace Inc. (FLY) and Kratos Defense & Security Solut (KTOS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FLY currently trades at $46.49 with a QOC of 6.4/10, while KTOS trades at $64.13 with a QOC of 8.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).