FLOC vs HMH

Flowco Holdings Inc. vs HMH Holding Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

FLOC

Oil & Gas Field Machinery & Equipment
Flowco Holdings Inc.
Quality
7.9
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$23.39
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

HMH

Oil & Gas Field Machinery & Equipment
HMH Holding Inc.
Quality
1.9
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$21.36
Last close
Models
8/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FLOC Fair ValueFLOC Upside HMH Fair ValueHMH Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $14.87 -36.4% $6.00 -71.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $8.32 -67.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $2.14 -90.9% $42.34 +86.7%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FLOC vs HMH — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FLOC vs HMH — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

FLOC scores higher with a 7.9/10 quality rating vs HMH's 1.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Flowco Holdings Inc. (FLOC) and HMH Holding Inc. (HMH) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FLOC currently trades at $23.39 with a QOC of 7.9/10, while HMH trades at $21.36 with a QOC of 1.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).