FLL vs GHG

Full House Resorts, Inc. vs GreenTree Hospitality Group Ltd — Valuation Comparison 2026

FLL

Hotels & Motels
Full House Resorts, Inc.
Quality
6.2
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$2.50
Last close
Models
8/13
Active
VS

GHG

Hotels & Motels
GreenTree Hospitality Group Ltd
Quality
7.3
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$1.28
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FLL Fair ValueFLL Upside GHG Fair ValueGHG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.50 -81.8% $1.77 +38.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $2.41 -9.1% $3.06 +139.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FLL vs GHG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FLL vs GHG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GHG scores higher with a 7.3/10 quality rating vs FLL's 6.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Full House Resorts, Inc. (FLL) and GreenTree Hospitality Group Ltd (GHG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FLL currently trades at $2.50 with a QOC of 6.2/10, while GHG trades at $1.28 with a QOC of 7.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).