FAST vs FERG

Fastenal Company vs Ferguson Enterprises Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

FAST

Industrial Distribution
Fastenal Company
Quality
9.8
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$44.76
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

FERG

Industrial Distribution
Ferguson Enterprises Inc.
Quality
9.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$226.49
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FAST Fair ValueFAST Upside FERG Fair ValueFERG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $16.14 -63.9% $174.74 -22.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $11.65 -74.0% $95.16 -58.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FAST vs FERG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FAST vs FERG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

FAST scores higher with a 9.8/10 quality rating vs FERG's 9.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Fastenal Company (FAST) and Ferguson Enterprises Inc. (FERG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FAST currently trades at $44.76 with a QOC of 9.8/10, while FERG trades at $226.49 with a QOC of 9.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).