FANG vs FTW

Diamondback Energy, Inc. vs Presidio Production Company — Valuation Comparison 2026

FANG

Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
Quality
9.0
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$191.48
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

FTW

Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas
Presidio Production Company
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$11.98
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FANG Fair ValueFANG Upside FTW Fair ValueFTW Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $590.27 +208.3% $3.22 -73.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $13.92 -92.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $825.30 +331.0% $11.80 -1.6%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FANG vs FTW — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FANG vs FTW — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

FANG scores higher with a 9.0/10 quality rating vs FTW's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Presidio Production Company (FTW) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FANG currently trades at $191.48 with a QOC of 9.0/10, while FTW trades at $11.98 with a QOC of 1.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).