ESQ vs ING

Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc vs ING Group, N.V. — Valuation Comparison 2026

ESQ

Commercial Banks, NEC
Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc
Quality
9.5
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$109.89
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

ING

Commercial Banks, NEC
ING Group, N.V.
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$30.94
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ESQ Fair ValueESQ Upside ING Fair ValueING Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $59.41 -45.9% $10.13 -67.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $71.14 -35.3% $12.67 -54.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ESQ vs ING — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ESQ vs ING — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ESQ scores higher with a 9.5/10 quality rating vs ING's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc (ESQ) and ING Group, N.V. (ING) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ESQ currently trades at $109.89 with a QOC of 9.5/10, while ING trades at $30.94 with a QOC of 1.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).