ESLT vs FLY

Elbit Systems Ltd. vs Firefly Aerospace Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

ESLT

Aerospace & Defense
Elbit Systems Ltd.
Quality
2.4
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$892.63
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

FLY

Aerospace & Defense
Firefly Aerospace Inc.
Quality
6.5
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$49.37
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ESLT Fair ValueESLT Upside FLY Fair ValueFLY Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $390.03 -56.3% $12.55 -74.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $47.96 -94.2% $9.38 -72.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ESLT vs FLY — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ESLT vs FLY — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

FLY scores higher with a 6.5/10 quality rating vs ESLT's 2.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Elbit Systems Ltd. (ESLT) and Firefly Aerospace Inc. (FLY) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ESLT currently trades at $892.63 with a QOC of 2.4/10, while FLY trades at $49.37 with a QOC of 6.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).