ERIE vs GSHD

Erie Indemnity Company vs Goosehead Insurance, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

ERIE

Insurance Brokers
Erie Indemnity Company
Quality
9.6
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$218.19
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

GSHD

Insurance Brokers
Goosehead Insurance, Inc.
Quality
8.8
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$35.23
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ERIE Fair ValueERIE Upside GSHD Fair ValueGSHD Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $157.38 -27.9% $23.39 -33.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $106.65 -51.1% $8.15 -76.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ERIE vs GSHD — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ERIE vs GSHD — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ERIE scores higher with a 9.6/10 quality rating vs GSHD's 8.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Erie Indemnity Company (ERIE) and Goosehead Insurance, Inc. (GSHD) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ERIE currently trades at $218.19 with a QOC of 9.6/10, while GSHD trades at $35.23 with a QOC of 8.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).