EPM vs EPSN

Evolution Petroleum Corporation vs Epsilon Energy Ltd. — Valuation Comparison 2026

EPM

Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas
Evolution Petroleum Corporation
Quality
6.8
out of 10
Value Trap
32
LOW
Price
$4.24
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

EPSN

Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas
Epsilon Energy Ltd.
Quality
7.2
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$5.66
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType EPM Fair ValueEPM Upside EPSN Fair ValueEPSN Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $10.97 +158.7% $11.22 +98.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.39 -91.7% $2.40 -57.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for EPM vs EPSN — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

EPM vs EPSN — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

EPSN scores higher with a 7.2/10 quality rating vs EPM's 6.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Evolution Petroleum Corporation (EPM) and Epsilon Energy Ltd. (EPSN) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

EPM currently trades at $4.24 with a QOC of 6.8/10, while EPSN trades at $5.66 with a QOC of 7.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).