EP vs FANG

Empire Petroleum Corporation vs Diamondback Energy, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

EP

Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas
Empire Petroleum Corporation
Quality
5.5
out of 10
Value Trap
44
WARN
Price
$2.54
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

FANG

Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
Quality
9.0
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$191.48
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType EP Fair ValueEP Upside FANG Fair ValueFANG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.25 -90.3% $590.27 +208.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $13.92 -92.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $0.14 -94.7% $300.31 +56.8%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for EP vs FANG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

EP vs FANG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

FANG scores higher with a 9.0/10 quality rating vs EP's 5.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Empire Petroleum Corporation (EP) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

EP currently trades at $2.54 with a QOC of 5.5/10, while FANG trades at $191.48 with a QOC of 9.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).