EP vs EPM

Empire Petroleum Corporation vs Evolution Petroleum Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

EP

Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas
Empire Petroleum Corporation
Quality
5.5
out of 10
Value Trap
44
WARN
Price
$2.54
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

EPM

Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas
Evolution Petroleum Corporation
Quality
6.8
out of 10
Value Trap
32
LOW
Price
$4.24
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType EP Fair ValueEP Upside EPM Fair ValueEPM Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.25 -90.3% $10.97 +158.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.39 -91.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $0.14 -94.7% $7.68 +81.1%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for EP vs EPM — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

EP vs EPM — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

EPM scores higher with a 6.8/10 quality rating vs EP's 5.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Empire Petroleum Corporation (EP) and Evolution Petroleum Corporation (EPM) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

EP currently trades at $2.54 with a QOC of 5.5/10, while EPM trades at $4.24 with a QOC of 6.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).