EL vs HELE

Estee Lauder Companies, Inc. (T vs Helen of Troy Limited — Valuation Comparison 2026

EL

Household & Personal Products
Estee Lauder Companies, Inc. (T
Quality
7.2
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$90.87
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

HELE

Household & Personal Products
Helen of Troy Limited
Quality
6.9
out of 10
Value Trap
27
LOW
Price
$27.12
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType EL Fair ValueEL Upside HELE Fair ValueHELE Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $38.90 -57.2% $60.03 +121.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $10.28 -88.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $51.23 -43.6% $76.18 +180.9%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for EL vs HELE — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

EL vs HELE — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

EL scores higher with a 7.2/10 quality rating vs HELE's 6.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Estee Lauder Companies, Inc. (T (EL) and Helen of Troy Limited (HELE) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

EL currently trades at $90.87 with a QOC of 7.2/10, while HELE trades at $27.12 with a QOC of 6.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).