DV vs KRKR

DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. vs 36Kr Holdings Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

DV

Advertising Agencies
DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc.
Quality
7.6
out of 10
Value Trap
31
LOW
Price
$9.66
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

KRKR

Advertising Agencies
36Kr Holdings Inc.
Quality
8.2
out of 10
Value Trap
43
WARN
Price
$3.51
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType DV Fair ValueDV Upside KRKR Fair ValueKRKR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $18.10 +87.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $3.98 -58.8% $14.98 +326.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $2.43 -74.8% $6.32 +80.0%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for DV vs KRKR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

DV vs KRKR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

KRKR scores higher with a 8.2/10 quality rating vs DV's 7.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. (DV) and 36Kr Holdings Inc. (KRKR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

DV currently trades at $9.66 with a QOC of 7.6/10, while KRKR trades at $3.51 with a QOC of 8.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).