DOLE vs EDBL

Dole plc vs Edible Garden AG Incorporated — Valuation Comparison 2026

DOLE

Farm Products
Dole plc
Quality
8.3
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$14.42
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

EDBL

Farm Products
Edible Garden AG Incorporated
Quality
3.8
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$0.29
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType DOLE Fair ValueDOLE Upside EDBL Fair ValueEDBL Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $6.76 -53.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $11.46 -20.6% $1.74 +256.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $36.96 +156.3% $0.22 -54.9%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for DOLE vs EDBL — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

DOLE vs EDBL — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

DOLE scores higher with a 8.3/10 quality rating vs EDBL's 3.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Dole plc (DOLE) and Edible Garden AG Incorporated (EDBL) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

DOLE currently trades at $14.42 with a QOC of 8.3/10, while EDBL trades at $0.29 with a QOC of 3.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).