DECK vs ONON

Deckers Outdoor Corporation vs On Holding AG — Valuation Comparison 2026

DECK

Footwear & Accessories
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$114.31
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

ONON

Footwear & Accessories
On Holding AG
Quality
8.5
out of 10
Value Trap
8
SAFE
Price
$39.75
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType DECK Fair ValueDECK Upside ONON Fair ValueONON Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $136.17 +19.1% $17.99 -54.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $79.06 -30.8% $15.24 -61.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for DECK vs ONON — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

DECK vs ONON — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

DECK scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs ONON's 8.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) and On Holding AG (ONON) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

DECK currently trades at $114.31 with a QOC of 10.0/10, while ONON trades at $39.75 with a QOC of 8.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).