DDS vs M

Dillard's, Inc. vs Macy's Inc — Valuation Comparison 2026

DDS

Department Stores
Dillard's, Inc.
Quality
8.8
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$608.68
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

M

Department Stores
Macy's Inc
Quality
7.1
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$22.45
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType DDS Fair ValueDDS Upside M Fair ValueM Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $576.28 -5.3% $69.34 +208.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $287.58 -52.8% $8.03 -59.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for DDS vs M — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

DDS vs M — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

DDS scores higher with a 8.8/10 quality rating vs M's 7.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Dillard's, Inc. (DDS) and Macy's Inc (M) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

DDS currently trades at $608.68 with a QOC of 8.8/10, while M trades at $22.45 with a QOC of 7.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).