DBD vs NATL

Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated vs NCR Atleos Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

DBD

Calculating & Accounting Machines (No Electronic Computers)
Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated
Quality
7.8
out of 10
Value Trap
26
LOW
Price
$81.14
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

NATL

Calculating & Accounting Machines (No Electronic Computers)
NCR Atleos Corporation
Quality
7.6
out of 10
Value Trap
14
SAFE
Price
$44.60
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType DBD Fair ValueDBD Upside NATL Fair ValueNATL Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $59.45 -26.7% $12.09 -72.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $75.22 -7.3% $43.15 -3.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for DBD vs NATL — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

DBD vs NATL — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

DBD scores higher with a 7.8/10 quality rating vs NATL's 7.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated (DBD) and NCR Atleos Corporation (NATL) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

DBD currently trades at $81.14 with a QOC of 7.8/10, while NATL trades at $44.60 with a QOC of 7.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).