CYD vs EMPD

China Yuchai International Limi vs Empery Digital Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

CYD

Auto Manufacturers
China Yuchai International Limi
Quality
7.3
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$56.33
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

EMPD

Auto Manufacturers
Empery Digital Inc.
Quality
3.4
out of 10
Value Trap
35
LOW
Price
$4.47
Last close
Models
5/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CYD Fair ValueCYD Upside EMPD Fair ValueEMPD Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $21.72 -61.4% $0.92 -81.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $40.60 -27.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $47.98 -14.8% $1.43 -70.8%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CYD vs EMPD — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CYD vs EMPD — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CYD scores higher with a 7.3/10 quality rating vs EMPD's 3.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing China Yuchai International Limi (CYD) and Empery Digital Inc. (EMPD) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CYD currently trades at $56.33 with a QOC of 7.3/10, while EMPD trades at $4.47 with a QOC of 3.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).