CPB vs MDLZ

The Campbell's Company vs Mondelez International, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

CPB

Food and Kindred Products
The Campbell's Company
Quality
8.5
out of 10
Value Trap
8
SAFE
Price
$21.11
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

MDLZ

Food and Kindred Products
Mondelez International, Inc.
Quality
7.9
out of 10
Value Trap
8
SAFE
Price
$61.17
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CPB Fair ValueCPB Upside MDLZ Fair ValueMDLZ Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $14.01 -33.7% $22.61 -63.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $6.46 -69.4% $9.38 -84.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CPB vs MDLZ — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CPB vs MDLZ — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CPB scores higher with a 8.5/10 quality rating vs MDLZ's 7.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing The Campbell's Company (CPB) and Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CPB currently trades at $21.11 with a QOC of 8.5/10, while MDLZ trades at $61.17 with a QOC of 7.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).