CPAC vs JHX

Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. vs James Hardie Industries plc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

CPAC

Building Materials
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.
Quality
2.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$10.62
Last close
Models
8/13
Active
VS

JHX

Building Materials
James Hardie Industries plc.
Quality
2.4
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$22.97
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CPAC Fair ValueCPAC Upside JHX Fair ValueJHX Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $2.81 -73.5% $5.79 -74.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $6.55 -69.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $5.57 -47.5% $32.06 +49.7%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CPAC vs JHX — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CPAC vs JHX — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

JHX scores higher with a 2.4/10 quality rating vs CPAC's 2.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. (CPAC) and James Hardie Industries plc. (JHX) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CPAC currently trades at $10.62 with a QOC of 2.0/10, while JHX trades at $22.97 with a QOC of 2.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).