COLM vs GOOS

Columbia Sportswear Company vs Canada Goose Holdings Inc. Subo — Valuation Comparison 2026

COLM

Apparel Manufacturing
Columbia Sportswear Company
Quality
7.2
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$67.79
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

GOOS

Apparel Manufacturing
Canada Goose Holdings Inc. Subo
Quality
8.3
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$9.98
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType COLM Fair ValueCOLM Upside GOOS Fair ValueGOOS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $36.35 -46.4% $16.93 +69.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $9.19 -86.4% $15.53 +55.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for COLM vs GOOS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

COLM vs GOOS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GOOS scores higher with a 8.3/10 quality rating vs COLM's 7.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Columbia Sportswear Company (COLM) and Canada Goose Holdings Inc. Subo (GOOS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

COLM currently trades at $67.79 with a QOC of 7.2/10, while GOOS trades at $9.98 with a QOC of 8.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).