COLD vs CTO

Americold Realty Trust, Inc. vs CTO Realty Growth, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

COLD

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Americold Realty Trust, Inc.
Quality
6.5
out of 10
Value Trap
13
SAFE
Price
$15.69
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

CTO

Real Estate Investment Trusts
CTO Realty Growth, Inc.
Quality
5.7
out of 10
Value Trap
46
WARN
Price
$20.55
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType COLD Fair ValueCOLD Upside CTO Fair ValueCTO Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $12.38 -21.1% $17.26 -16.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $12.70 -19.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $10.34 -34.1% $3.89 -81.1%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for COLD vs CTO — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

COLD vs CTO — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

COLD scores higher with a 6.5/10 quality rating vs CTO's 5.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Americold Realty Trust, Inc. (COLD) and CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

COLD currently trades at $15.69 with a QOC of 6.5/10, while CTO trades at $20.55 with a QOC of 5.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).