CMCO vs MTW

Columbus McKinnon Corporation vs Manitowoc Company, Inc. (The) — Valuation Comparison 2026

CMCO

Construction Machinery & Equip
Columbus McKinnon Corporation
Quality
5.5
out of 10
Value Trap
25
LOW
Price
$15.96
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

MTW

Construction Machinery & Equip
Manitowoc Company, Inc. (The)
Quality
6.8
out of 10
Value Trap
16
SAFE
Price
$11.83
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CMCO Fair ValueCMCO Upside MTW Fair ValueMTW Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $16.88 +5.8% $0.76 -93.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.51 -90.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $1.50 -90.2% $16.25 +37.3%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CMCO vs MTW — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CMCO vs MTW — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

MTW scores higher with a 6.8/10 quality rating vs CMCO's 5.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) and Manitowoc Company, Inc. (The) (MTW) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CMCO currently trades at $15.96 with a QOC of 5.5/10, while MTW trades at $11.83 with a QOC of 6.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).