CMCO vs GENC

Columbus McKinnon Corporation vs Gencor Industries, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

CMCO

Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery
Columbus McKinnon Corporation
Quality
5.5
out of 10
Value Trap
25
LOW
Price
$16.11
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

GENC

Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery
Gencor Industries, Inc.
Quality
9.8
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$14.46
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CMCO Fair ValueCMCO Upside GENC Fair ValueGENC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $15.90 -1.3% $4.78 -67.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.51 -90.7% $9.31 -35.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CMCO vs GENC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CMCO vs GENC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GENC scores higher with a 9.8/10 quality rating vs CMCO's 5.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) and Gencor Industries, Inc. (GENC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CMCO currently trades at $16.11 with a QOC of 5.5/10, while GENC trades at $14.46 with a QOC of 9.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).