CLDT vs COLD

Chatham Lodging Trust (REIT) vs Americold Realty Trust, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

CLDT

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Chatham Lodging Trust (REIT)
Quality
7.0
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$10.85
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

COLD

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Americold Realty Trust, Inc.
Quality
6.5
out of 10
Value Trap
13
SAFE
Price
$15.69
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CLDT Fair ValueCLDT Upside COLD Fair ValueCOLD Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $5.11 -52.9% $12.38 -21.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $12.70 -19.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $10.53 -2.9% $15.68 -0.0%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CLDT vs COLD — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CLDT vs COLD — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CLDT scores higher with a 7.0/10 quality rating vs COLD's 6.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Chatham Lodging Trust (REIT) (CLDT) and Americold Realty Trust, Inc. (COLD) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CLDT currently trades at $10.85 with a QOC of 7.0/10, while COLD trades at $15.69 with a QOC of 6.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).