CHCI vs CRESY

Comstock Holding Companies, Inc vs Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A. — Valuation Comparison 2026

CHCI

Real Estate
Comstock Holding Companies, Inc
Quality
8.3
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$15.24
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

CRESY

Real Estate
Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A.
Quality
2.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$11.91
Last close
Models
6/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CHCI Fair ValueCHCI Upside CRESY Fair ValueCRESY Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $5.62 -63.1% $2.88 -75.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $3.82 -74.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $69.03 +479.6%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CHCI vs CRESY — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CHCI vs CRESY — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CHCI scores higher with a 8.3/10 quality rating vs CRESY's 2.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Comstock Holding Companies, Inc (CHCI) and Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A. (CRESY) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CHCI currently trades at $15.24 with a QOC of 8.3/10, while CRESY trades at $11.91 with a QOC of 2.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).