CETX vs MRCY

Cemtrex Inc. vs Mercury Systems Inc — Valuation Comparison 2026

CETX

Electronic Components & Accessories
Cemtrex Inc.
Quality
5.9
out of 10
Value Trap
27
LOW
Price
$0.93
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

MRCY

Electronic Components & Accessories
Mercury Systems Inc
Quality
7.9
out of 10
Value Trap
26
LOW
Price
$111.70
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CETX Fair ValueCETX Upside MRCY Fair ValueMRCY Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.61 -31.5% $17.15 -84.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.06 +18.7% $17.15 -84.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CETX vs MRCY — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CETX vs MRCY — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

MRCY scores higher with a 7.9/10 quality rating vs CETX's 5.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Cemtrex Inc. (CETX) and Mercury Systems Inc (MRCY) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CETX currently trades at $0.93 with a QOC of 5.9/10, while MRCY trades at $111.70 with a QOC of 7.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).