CDRE vs DRS

Cadre Holdings, Inc. vs Leonardo DRS, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

CDRE

Aerospace & Defense
Cadre Holdings, Inc.
Quality
8.8
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$31.95
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

DRS

Aerospace & Defense
Leonardo DRS, Inc.
Quality
9.3
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$48.41
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CDRE Fair ValueCDRE Upside DRS Fair ValueDRS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $11.32 -64.6% $5.44 -88.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.50 -95.3% $8.32 -82.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CDRE vs DRS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CDRE vs DRS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

DRS scores higher with a 9.3/10 quality rating vs CDRE's 8.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Cadre Holdings, Inc. (CDRE) and Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CDRE currently trades at $31.95 with a QOC of 8.8/10, while DRS trades at $48.41 with a QOC of 9.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).