BTSG vs BTSGU

BrightSpring Health Services, I vs BrightSpring Health Services, I — Valuation Comparison 2026

BTSG

Health Information Services
BrightSpring Health Services, I
Quality
8.3
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$60.83
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

BTSGU

Health Information Services
BrightSpring Health Services, I
Quality
8.0
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$205.26
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BTSG Fair ValueBTSG Upside BTSGU Fair ValueBTSGU Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $26.80 -55.9% $60.58 -70.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $8.11 -86.7% $9.25 -95.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BTSG vs BTSGU — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BTSG vs BTSGU — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

BTSG scores higher with a 8.3/10 quality rating vs BTSGU's 8.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing BrightSpring Health Services, I (BTSG) and BrightSpring Health Services, I (BTSGU) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BTSG currently trades at $60.83 with a QOC of 8.3/10, while BTSGU trades at $205.26 with a QOC of 8.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).