AZZ vs NTIC

AZZ Inc. vs Northern Technologies Internati — Valuation Comparison 2026

AZZ

Coating, Engraving & Allied Services
AZZ Inc.
Quality
9.9
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$135.51
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

NTIC

Coating, Engraving & Allied Services
Northern Technologies Internati
Quality
8.8
out of 10
Value Trap
16
SAFE
Price
$8.00
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType AZZ Fair ValueAZZ Upside NTIC Fair ValueNTIC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $100.63 -25.7% $0.46 -94.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $31.29 -76.9% $0.70 -91.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for AZZ vs NTIC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

AZZ vs NTIC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

AZZ scores higher with a 9.9/10 quality rating vs NTIC's 8.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing AZZ Inc. (AZZ) and Northern Technologies Internati (NTIC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

AZZ currently trades at $135.51 with a QOC of 9.9/10, while NTIC trades at $8.00 with a QOC of 8.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).