Quick Summary — AZN scores higher on quality with 10.0/10 vs JNJ's 9.8/10. AZN trades at $177.45 while JNJ trades at $222.89. Both analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR data across 13 institutional models.
AZN scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs JNJ's 9.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.
At $177.45, AZN trades +33.0% above its Bayesian DCF fair value of $118.84, while JNJ at $222.89 trades +66.3% above its estimate of $75.18. JNJ shows a wider gap between price and intrinsic value.
AZN earns a Quality of Company score of 10.0/10 compared to JNJ's 9.8/10. The scores are closely matched, indicating similar fundamental quality profiles. The QOC score synthesizes 32 signals spanning profitability margins, revenue growth, free cash flow, capital allocation, and leverage.
AZN carries a SAFE value trap risk (6/100) while JNJ shows SAFE risk (17/100). Both companies show manageable value trap risk, suggesting their current valuations are not artificially depressed by fundamental deterioration.
Both AZN and JNJ operate in Drug Manufacturers - General, which has 20 stocks tracked by CirclFi. Same-industry comparisons provide the most direct insight into relative valuation since both companies face similar regulatory environments, market dynamics, and competitive pressures. Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN), and ensemble methods (CUCE).
11 hidden models compare AZN vs JNJ differently — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more. Some may disagree with the 2 you see above.
Bloomberg Terminal: ~$2,000/mo · FactSet: ~$1,000/mo · CirclFi: $0.90/day
See All 13 Models — $0.90/dayWe don’t predict prices. We show you what 13 independent mathematical frameworks say a stock is worth — and let you decide.