AVY vs ITP

Avery Dennison Corporation vs IT Tech Packaging, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

AVY

Converted Paper & Paperboard Prods (No Contaners/Boxes)
Avery Dennison Corporation
Quality
9.2
out of 10
Value Trap
5
SAFE
Price
$159.07
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

ITP

Converted Paper & Paperboard Prods (No Contaners/Boxes)
IT Tech Packaging, Inc.
Quality
6.2
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$0.19
Last close
Models
3/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType AVY Fair ValueAVY Upside ITP Fair ValueITP Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $139.35 -12.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $40.16 -74.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $102.42 -35.6% $1.09 +471.2%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $87.48 -45.0% $0.85 +350.0%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for AVY vs ITP — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

AVY vs ITP — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

AVY scores higher with a 9.2/10 quality rating vs ITP's 6.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Avery Dennison Corporation (AVY) and IT Tech Packaging, Inc. (ITP) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

AVY currently trades at $159.07 with a QOC of 9.2/10, while ITP trades at $0.19 with a QOC of 6.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).