AVAV vs BYRN

AeroVironment, Inc. vs Byrna Technologies, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

AVAV

Aerospace & Defense
AeroVironment, Inc.
Quality
8.0
out of 10
Value Trap
25
LOW
Price
$214.39
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

BYRN

Aerospace & Defense
Byrna Technologies, Inc.
Quality
8.2
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$6.55
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType AVAV Fair ValueAVAV Upside BYRN Fair ValueBYRN Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $48.46 -77.4% $1.84 -72.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $21.18 -88.5% $5.36 -18.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for AVAV vs BYRN — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

AVAV vs BYRN — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

BYRN scores higher with a 8.2/10 quality rating vs AVAV's 8.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) and Byrna Technologies, Inc. (BYRN) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

AVAV currently trades at $214.39 with a QOC of 8.0/10, while BYRN trades at $6.55 with a QOC of 8.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).